Update README (fix typos, formatting)

scripts/memory_compute_estimations/README.md

@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ which can then be iterated upon.
 The estimations are given based on the usual hyperparameters chosen when
 training a Transformer-type LLM: number of layers, number of heads, embeddings
 dimension, batch size, training context length, vocabulary size. These should
-give a rough idea as to the memory requirements for a classical GPT-style
-decoder-only Transformer. Other modifications on top of the architecture (such
-as SwiGLU activations inside the feedforward layer, multi-query or grouped-query
+give a rough idea as to the requirements for a classical GPT-style decoder-only
+Transformer. Other modifications on top of the architecture (such as SwiGLU
+activations inside the feedforward layer, multi-query or grouped-query
 attention, rotary positional embeddings etc.) will likely change the values by a
 little bit, however not enough to justify a totally different approach to the
 estimations.
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ it and get the output.
 Notice that total compute is not affected by either batch size or context
 length. Since the model needs to see the whole dataset anyway, it doesn't really
 matter how it is partitioned (it doesn't matter whether there are fewer big
-chunks, or more large chunks). Batch size and context length will, however,
+chunks, or more small chunks). Batch size and context length will, however,
 affect memory usage. Context length will also indirectly affect dataset size.
 The intuition is that bigger context would need more dataset tokens to be
 fully trained. Increasing context length should generally result in increasing
@@ -81,8 +81,9 @@ scenario).
 
 Be careful about the estimations given low numbers (low dataset size, a model
 with a low number of parameters etc.), as communication/software times will
-start to matter when the compute needed per step update is low. The GPU's
-usually work best when fed big matrices, which keeps them occupied more fully.
+start to matter when the compute needed per batch update is low. The GPU's
+usually work best when fed big matrices and when network communication only
+represents a small percent of the batch update.
 
 # Running the scripts together